
Statutory Public Inquiry
Only a Statutory Public Inquiry has the power to compel witnesses to give evidence. Without a statutory inquiry, survivors – and the public – will never know how Fayed, his associates, and the organizations they controlled, were able to operate a system of abuse in plain sight. The truth must be revealed so that lessons can be learned.

NOA welcomes the APPG for the Survivors of Fayed and Harrods
NOA welcomes the announcement of the APPG for Survivors of Fayed and Harrods. This is the first step toward recognising the devastating impact of organised sexual abuse and trafficking linked to one of Britain’s most celebrated institutions.
We hope that the APPG will provide a safe, trauma-informed forum for all survivors by centring their voices and needs. We especially welcome the perspectives and support of parliamentarians and experts from academia, the third sector and the law, and we urge that the APPG Terms of Reference include the facts of trafficking in relation to the Fayed/Harrods case – and the adequacy of ongoing investigations.
NOA members' call for a statutory public inquiry
Letter to the Prime Minister: Request for a Statutory Public Inquiry
In May 2025, NOA members and allies delivered a formal letter to 10 Downing Street requesting that the UK Government establish a statutory public inquiry into serious allegations of sexual abuse, exploitation, and institutional failure involving Harrods, the late Mohamed Al Fayed, and associated individuals and entities.
The letter detailed survivors’ reports of long-term abuse, systemic cover-ups, and the use of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and intimidation to silence victims, alongside failures by Harrods management, law enforcement, and public authorities to act appropriately. It called for an inquiry to determine how such abuses were allowed to persist, assess the conduct of those in positions of power, and affirm that influence and wealth do not place anyone above accountability.
The proposed inquiry would examine internal safeguarding failures, the role of Al Fayed and his associates, the response of public institutions, and the mechanisms used to suppress complaints. Survivors and advocates expressed their willingness to support the process to ensure it is trauma-informed, credible, and transparent.
With growing media and parliamentary attention and parallels to other high-profile abuse scandals, the submission underscored the urgent public need for truth, justice, and systemic reform.

Don't public inquiries take years and the recommendations are ignored?
Public inquiries have come under scrutiny for offering at best delayed accountability over a prolonged, costly and sometimes re-traumatising process for survivors. The recommendations produced are often shelved. We agree with these concerns. However, there is no other vehicle to expose the truth and learn lessons from significant institutional failings – especially where perpetrators have successfully obstructed survivors' path to justice.
NOA supports the recommendations of the Lords report on Public Inquiries: Enhancing Public Trust – specifically that inquiries should be shorter and their recommendations should be tracked (see commentary in the Guardian).
Calls for a public inquiry
